SAMR MODEL
Image Source: Edmodo
The image below helped me understand how different programs fall into the different steps. After learning about each of the steps I was able to understand why programs were categorized in that step.
Image Source: (CPS Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Digital Learning (CIDL)
Dr. Ruben Puentedura created the SAMR model as a way for teachers to evaluate how they are incorporating technology into their instructional practice. I chose to use SAMR model because CPS is incorporating it for teachers to evaluate their technology integration too. The SAMR model is broken up into four components and can be viewed as moving up a ladder . The image above explains each step of the ladder.
- Substitution is the first step. It is when technology acts as a direct substitute, with no functional change.
- Augmentation is the second step. It is when technology acts as a direct substitute, with functional improvement.
- Modification is the third step. It is when technology allows for significant task redesign.
- Redefinition is the fourth and final step. It is when technology allows for the creation of new tasks, previously inconceivable.
If you are anything like me, examples and visuals help me comprehend more. Below is an image that helped me understand SAMR in the context of my subject and how each step of the ladder differs from the previous. Every step up the ladder is a step in closer where technology allows the creation of the task.
The image below helped me understand how different programs fall into the different steps. After learning about each of the steps I was able to understand why programs were categorized in that step.
(Image Source: ThingLink)
In substitution, they show programs like Brain Pop and search engines such as Google. They are both substitution because google searching replaces something that could have been searched for in an encyclopedia, and watching a video replaces something a teacher could have taught. Augmentation is different because it allows for communication through technology. For example, students can create a poll or a word doc that they are editing together. Modification allows for collaboration. Students are redesigning the task through technology. They can use the geoboard app to explain a Math concept. And lastly, Redefinition allows for students for students to create something that could not have been done without technology. Students can network through google hangouts, and create projects with students across the world.
When I used SAMR to evaluate my technology integration I found that I use the first 3 steps of the ladder the most. Luckily for me, in my school we have one-to-one technology that I able to do creative things using technology with my students daily. I often use substitution for testing. I create google tests and allow the students to take their tests on the computer and I use a program called Orange slice to automatically grade them and send back their scores. The students have used Augmentation when I have them use the geoboard app to create videos on the different types of triangles. Lastly, they use Modification when I have them create Kahoot Review games for other groups to complete as an assignment before a test. After evaluating myself I am reflecting on how I can use Redefinition in my math class. I am challenging myself to integrate at least one assignment by the end of the year. Check back and I will update you on what I come up with!
I enjoyed learning about SAMR and I found some amazing resources that can be beneficial to any educator. I have shared them below.
Hi Amelia,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed learning about the SAMR framework on your blog. I have never used orange slice before and will definitely be checking it out! The image from ThingLink is a great visual and helps me to understand each step on the SAMR ladder.
You are so lucky to be 1:1! That is the biggest problem with integrating technology in my classroom; especially when we are benchmark testing.
You really put this in a way that makes sense and helped to clarify the difference with some of the steps! It sounds like you really are targeting the steps of this framework! Great job!
Toni
Hi Amelia,
ReplyDeleteI did not know CPS was incorporating the SAMR model thanks for sharing that information. From your self-evaluation it looks like you were already incorporating most of the elements of the SAMR framework in teaching your students. It's great to see that your school has fully embraced technology and made it 1:1. You're not only trailblazing the way you teach your curriculum, but your students are also experiencing a different way of learning. I am really excited for you and the things you are doing in the classroom!
I hadn't seen the graphic you included from Thinglink so thanks for posting. The visual examples help me as well. While I am happy people have put together examples of apps/tools that fit in each level of SAMR I wish they would do a better job of telling people that these are just guidelines. The danger falls when folks pick an app from the "redefinition" stage to use and then think "hey! I'm innovative!". It isn't the app itself, it's how it redefined the lesson. Looking forward to seeing how you are able to incorporate additional technology into your math class!
ReplyDeleteI have to agree! Many people see those graphics and feel the need to just apply an app and fail to realize that they can come up with some thing more unique and fitting for their class/subject. As I dove deeper into learning more about the SAMR model I learned more about the application of each step and the "how" behind it. It helped me understand that there is more to it than just apps or programs. I really enjoyed this assignment!
Delete